When AI Gets a Body, It Can Be as Small as a Tag
Case of the Week, Min Wu, PhD · ai-public-health.com
In his freshman year of high school, one of my twin sons quit the varsity tennis team and joined cross country. I did not see it coming, and I will admit it took me a while to accept. But I did, and for every season after that I went to his meets.
I never fully understood long-distance running. What I understood was the finish line. I would wait there, watch him come in visibly suffering, and watch him finish anyway. I bought him a lot of running shoes. He trained through the whole summer. His time on the 5K course dropped to around 19 minutes, and he still ran mostly on the junior varsity team, outside the top seven who made varsity.
Every one of those races was read by a small chip he wore. He never touched it, never charged it, never looked at it. Mats on the ground recorded him as he crossed, and the results sorted themselves.
In his junior year he went back to tennis. He made varsity again, and he and his twin brother reached the top eight in the state doubles tournament. No mat read any of that.
The Smallest Possible Body
When people imagine AI getting a body, they picture a robot: arms, wheels, a face on a screen. In Role Makes the Robot, I imagined one in an older adult's hallway.
But the key change doesn't need any of that. AI gets a body the moment it can notice something in the physical world and respond to it without anyone typing a question. At my son's meets, that body was a chip with no battery and a mat on the ground. The chip didn't think. It only said "this runner, here, now." Everything else happened in the system behind the mat.
That is the whole idea in its simplest form. A tag, a reader, and a system that knows what to do when the two meet.
Bodies get bigger from here. One step up is a small device on a kitchen counter, with a few buttons and a voice, that can listen and talk back. Further up is a robot that can move through a room and use its hands. Each step lets AI sense more and do more, and each step raises harder questions. But the tag is where it starts: the first, smallest form of a body.
What Changes When AI Has a Body
Most AI today waits for you. You open an app, type a question, read the answer, and decide what to do. Everything depends on you holding a device and knowing how to use it.
A body reverses that. My son never opened anything. He ran, and the course knew he was there. He didn't need a phone, a password, or a single decision about the technology. All he had to do was cross the line.
That reversal matters most for the people a device-based system misses. A heat advisory pushed to every phone in a county assumes you have the phone, that it's charged, that you read the alert, and that you can act on it. For many isolated older adults, one of those assumptions fails, and the help fails with it.
A Tag That Reaches Instead of Ranks
I've been designing a system that gives AI this kind of small body for a different job. An isolated older adult who chooses to enroll wears a thin wristband with no battery and nothing to operate. During a heat emergency, when the wristband is read at a building entrance, the system checks what that person needs against what's available right now (a nearby shuttle with open seats, a cooling center with room) and sends an offer: a pickup time, a place, a reserved spot. The person can say yes or no.
The body is almost identical to my son's race chip. The job is the opposite. The race reads you to place you. This design reads you to reach you. As in the robot essay, the hardware decides very little. What the system does when the tag is read decides everything.
What the Runner Can See and the Resident Can't
Here is where I'm less comfortable.
My son knew exactly where he was being read. The mats were on the ground in front of him. The race had a start and a finish, and he chose to enter it. When the race ended, so did the reading.
A resident in a heat program doesn't get those signals. The reader is built into a doorway. The program runs all summer. My design tries to answer this: the tag carries only an identifier, no location history is kept, and a resident can withdraw at any time without handing back hardware. I believe those are the right choices.
But giving AI a body means the person no longer has to hold anything, and that cuts both ways. It removes a barrier, and it removes a switch. A phone can be turned off. A doorway can't. I don't yet know whether a consent the resident can take back is enough of a switch, especially for someone who may never think about the reader again after enrolling.
Purpose Makes the Tag.
Observer's Insight
The chip recorded every second my son spent on those courses. It knew his times better than I did, and I've already forgotten most of them. It knew nothing about why he switched sports, what the summer training cost him, or what he carried back to tennis two years later. A body, however small, senses only what happens where it stands.
That's the right limit for a race. For AI that lives in the places people live, the limit has to be designed on purpose: where it stands, what it reads, what it does next, and when it stops. The tag doesn't decide any of that. The people who build the system do.
As a member of the Springer Nature Author Affiliate Program, I may earn a small commission from purchases made through this affiliated link to my book. Support the author by checking out my textbook, Artificial Intelligence in Public Health: https://tidd.ly/4mH9389
